The first political cartoon by Adam Zyglis is expressing that Romney has different views each time he is having a debate. Just like when you each chocolate from a chocolate box one will get a different kind each time. One does not just know what piece of chocolate to pick because they're all so delicious; this is the same concept with Romney because he does not know which side to choose in a given situation. The second political cartoon by Eric Allie is depicting that Romney has won the debated fairly, but Obama has been great in the debates but not good enough to win them. The cartoon is also depicting that the Democrats think that Obama did a great job and has a chance to win. The first cartoon depicts that Romney constantly changes his views whereas the second cartoon depicts that Romney has won all the debates and has a good chance of winning the election.
The two political cartoons differ because the first cartoon is pro Obama because it is trying to explain that Romney would be a horrible choice because of his conflicting views on the situation in the United States. If Romney were to be elected then none of the problems would be solved because he would start one solution and change his mind and jump to another one. The second cartoon is pro Romney because it emphasizes how he has won the debates and has a very good chance to win the election.
The two political cartoon have little to none comparison because they are both saying incredibly different. Ont thing that I can point out is that in the first cartoon Obama is being smiled upon and in the second picture, though it is pro Romney, depicts that Obama has done a fairly good job in the debates due to the fact that the Obama campaign says "Great tackle!"
